, a database manufacturer may require omission of a competitor, if it uses the database to a comparison of data with its competitor. In the case decided the competitor had read changes in the database with a data matching and for its database used to update the data. The Supreme Court has prohibited this and the competitors for infringing the copyright of the database producer to refrain convicted. Already a single collection of all changed data refer by creating a cached list of changes to a qualitatively substantial part of the database (BGH 30.04.2009, I ZR 191/05). The extraction of an insubstantial part of a database may incidentally be allowed. www.anwalt-strieder.de www.telefonrechtsrat.de
0 comments:
Post a Comment