retail customers do not have Internet access "rent", ie, not third parties may purchase them . That means in any case, the OLG Köln (Az 6 U 223/08), the matter will probably be decided by the Supreme Court. The defendant took advantage of a flat rate Internet access to a third party has access to the Internet at Allowing certain course against a payment. The Court of Appeal said that this right from the phone, respectively DSL contract is not covered. I can only join in. The access provider provides (at least) is primarily a service to its customers. The fee model is uniquely adapted to a private use, so that all may use if family members to the locations of the DSL line as appointed amongst these. Third is a right of use, and therefore not accessible to the technically provided internet access allows. They use the technical facilities of the provider that is, without a license agreement. The right way, the provider I think both omission of all Involved, as well as damages, or the publication of a so-called enrichment claim.
www.anwalt-strieder.de (Solingen ud Leverkusen, advice and representation nationwide)
0 comments:
Post a Comment